Keywords
Abstract
The article examines the role of presupposition in speech manipulation in advertising texts, using Uzbek as the material. Presupposition triggers (change-of-state words, comparative forms, factive and existential constructions, questions, particles) are classified, and the mechanism of their covert influence on the consumer is described. The article also proposes practical criteria for identifying presupposition and considers its use in teaching.
References
Frege G. Über Sinn und Bedeutung // Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik. – 1892. – Bd. 100.
Strawson P. F. On Referring // Mind. – 1950. – Vol. 59. – P. 320-344.
Stalnaker R. Pragmatic Presuppositions // Semantics and Philosophy. – New York: NYU Press, 1974. – P. 197-214.
Lewis D. Scorekeeping in a Language Game // Journal of Philosophical Logic. – 1979. – Vol. 8. – P. 339-359.
Leech G. English in Advertising. – London: Longman, 1966.
Cook G. The Discourse of Advertising. – London: Routledge, 1992.
Fairclough N. Language and Power. – London: Longman, 1989.
van Dijk T. A. Discourse and Manipulation // Discourse & Society. – 2006. – Vol. 17(3). – P. 359-383.
Lombardi Vallauri E., Masia V. Implicitness impact: measuring texts // Journal of Pragmatics. – 2014. – Vol. 61. – P. 161-184.
Sayfullayeva R. va boshq. Hozirgi o‘zbek adabiy tili. – Toshkent, 2010.